Jerome Mutumba
From time to time, figures disclosed in audited financial statements ignite public debate, particularly when they relate to loan write-offs.
These conversations are understandable and, in many ways, healthy in a transparent financial system.
From Hindsight to Foresight
In the past, banks recognised credit losses only after borrowers had already defaulted, often masking underlying risk and overstating financial strength.
The global financial crisis of 2008 exposed the danger of this approach, as losses were recognised too late.
This shift gave rise to the introduction of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 9, which shifted banking to a forward-looking model.
IFRS 9 requires financial institutions to recognise expected credit losses earlier and to write off loans once there is no reasonable expectation of recovery.
This ensures that balance sheets reflect economic reality rather than delayed or optimistic assumptions.
What a Write-Off Really Means
A write-off occurs when a loan has reached a point where, from an accounting perspective, there is no longer a reasonable expectation of recovery.
This point is typically reached only after a borrower has failed to honour their repayment obligations and the bank has exhausted all reasonable recovery options. These steps usually include enforcing security, liquidating pledged assets, pursuing legal remedies, and listing the defaulting client with credit information bureaux, among other collection measures.
This process is not arbitrary.
Financial institutions operate within internationally accepted best-practice standards that govern when impaired debts must be recognised.
In Namibia, the regulatory framework implemented by the Bank of Namibia requires banking institutions to write off qualifying non-performing exposures after 365 days in arrears.
Most commercial banks apply this benchmark as part of standard risk management and regulatory compliance.
Development finance institutions apply an even more measured approach.
Given their mandate to support long-term economic development and higher-risk sectors, institutions such as the Development Bank of Namibia use the 365-day requirement as a benchmark, while allowing for an additional calibrated extension of 90 days in arrears before a write-off is applied.
Crucially, an accounting write-off does not mean debt forgiveness.
It remains the prerogative of the financier to recover or continue attempting to recover any amounts that may be possible.
At this stage, the write-off simply ensures that loans with no reasonable expectation of recovery no longer distort the bank’s true financial position.
What Write-Offs Mean for Financial Institutions
Far from signalling distress, write-offs improve the credibility of a financial institution’s balance sheet.
They ensure that asset values are not overstated, that risks are acknowledged honestly, and that stakeholders can rely on the financial information presented.
Over time, some legacy exposures inevitably reach a point where accounting standards require them to be recognised as impaired. Addressing these exposures transparently is a hallmark of good governance.
The Bigger Picture
At its core, writing off bad debts is about integrity. It ensures that financial institutions present financial statements that reflect economic reality rather than optimism. When understood in this context, write-offs are not a cause for alarm, but evidence of a financial system that is functioning as it should.
Jerome Mutumba is the Chief Marketing and Corporate Affairs Manager.
COMMENTS